There are going to be many articles posted on this page from many and varied sources.
All are showing the Climate Emergency we are supposedly in and at the end I’ll put in some current results about The Great Barrier Reef.
Even I remember the news that Great Australian Barrier Reef that was dying from the Climate Change Global Warming problem. As it turns out today, it was just another chapter that these money hungry tyrants are putting out there.
If, after having read every telegram post, watched every video on this page – and this other one – and you still believe Climate Change is real. There is absolutely nothing I can do for you.

David Ashton webmaster
Anything the New World Order does “for your safety” comes at the cost of your freedoms.
And they will go to the end of the earth to get them: Psyops, warfare, division, all the above.
The beauty is we are in control.  GOD is in control.

To prove this 1989 article is true:

Is a 1989 ‘U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked’ Article Authentic?

Posted on  by Kim LaCapria


A 1989 Associated Press article predicted disaster if “global warming” went unchecked.




On May 14 2019, a Facebook user shared the following screenshot (archived here), purportedly showing a 1989 Associated Press item prognosticating “disaster” by the year 2000 if “global warming” remained unchecked:

In the screenshot, text from an unlinked Associated Press article’s headline and first sentence was visible (with indicated emphasis), reading:

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked
UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

The screenshot is authentic. It was captured from a June 29, 1989 article by Peter James Spielmann. As the excerpt showed, the headline referenced a United Nations prediction, and the first sentence attributed the prediction to a UN official, continuing:

Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of “eco-refugees,” threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.
He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.
As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview [in June 1989].
The most conservative scientific estimate that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years, said Brown.
The difference may seem slight, he said, but the planet is only 9 degrees warmer now than during the 8,000-year Ice Age that ended 10,000 years ago.

Although the screenshot was authentic and unaltered, the implication of emphasis on the date and timeframes described was done so in a way that readers might infer Brown’s predictions did not come to pass. In 1989, the portion excerpted above described a thirty-year period, which concluded in 2019.

But a June 2018 piece in The Guardian marked a slightly different thirty-year prediction, one that came just before the 1989 Associated Press report:

Thirty years after a former Nasa scientist sounded the alarm for the general public about climate change and human activity, the expert issued a fresh warning that the world is failing “miserably” to deal with the worsening dangers … [Former NASA climate scientist James] Hansen provided what’s considered the first warning to a mass audience about global warming when, in 1988, he told a US congressional hearing he could declare “with 99% confidence” that a recent sharp rise in temperatures was a result of human activity.
Since this time, the world’s greenhouse gas emissions have mushroomed despite repeated, increasingly frantic warnings about civilization-shaking catastrophe, from scientists amassing reams of evidence in Hansen’s wake.
Hansen’s frustrations temper any satisfaction at largely being vindicated for his testimony, delivered to lawmakers on 23 June 1988.
Wearing a cream-coloured suit, the soft-spoken son of Iowan tenant farmers hunched over the microphone in Washington to explain that humans had entered a confronting new era. “The greenhouse effect has been detected and it is changing our climate now,” he said.
Afterwards, Hansen told reporters: “It is time to stop waffling so much and say that the evidence is pretty strong that the greenhouse effect is here.” He brandished new research that forecast that 1988 was set to be the warmest year on record, as well as projections for future heat under three different emissions scenarios. The world has dutifully followed Hansen’s “scenario B” — we are “smack on it”, Hansen said last week — with global temperatures jumping by around 1C (1.8F) over the past century.

In the original AP article, the paper said that as of 1989, the “most conservative scientific estimate that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years.” In 2018, Hansen said temperatures had elevated by about one degree in the past century.

On the subject of the measurable effects of climate change, Axios also examined the period between Hansen’s testimony and 2018:

Three decades have passed since then-NASA scientist James Hansen testified before the Senate Energy committee and alerted the country to the arrival of global warming [in 1988].

Why it matters: The predictions of the world’s leading climate scientists have come true, with dire consequence for the planet.

  • In the 30-year period prior to Hansen’s testimony, the Earth’s surface was, on average, less than 0.2°F warmer than the 20th-century average. In the 30 years since, the planet’s surface has, on average, undergone a six-fold temperature increase.
  • Hansen’s temperature projections weren’t exactly on target, since he projected a slightly higher amount of warming than what has occurred, but about two-dozen climate scientists told Axios that overall, his main conclusions were right.

In a February 2019 Vox article, journalist and author of The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming David Wallace-Wells posited of the current effects of climate change:

It’s bad. The future looks pretty dark from where we are now. So we are a little north of 1.1 degrees C of [average] warming above the preindustrial baseline, which is the historical temperature conditions that we measure global warming against. And already at 1.1 degrees, we’re seeing a lot of really extreme climate events.
Last year in the summer of 2018 in the Northern Hemisphere you had this unprecedented heat wave that killed people all around the world. You had the crazy hurricane season. In California, wildfires burned more than a million acres. And we’re really only just beginning to see these sorts of effects.
If we continue on the track we’re on now, in terms of emissions, and we just take the wildfire example, conventional wisdom says that by the end of the century we could be seeing roughly 64 times as much land burned every year as we saw in 2018, a year that felt completely unprecedented and inflicted unimaginable damage in California.
And we see trajectories like this in basically every area of potential climate impact — from impact on agricultural yields, to public health issues, to the relationship between climate change and economic growth, climate change and conflict. On virtually every conceivable metric, things are going to get considerably worse. And if we don’t change course rapidly, they’re going to get catastrophically worse.
The UN says we’re on track to get to about 4 degrees or 4.3 degrees of warming by the end of the century if we continue as we are. I don’t think that we’ll get there, this century at least. I think that we’ll take enough action to avert that. But I think it’s really important to know what it would mean to land there, because that is a much more reasonable anchor for our expectations.

Material published by the Union of Concerned Scientists revised in November 2016 detailed observable changes to the worldwide climate:

The globe is warming. In 2013, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded in its authoritative fifth assessment report that “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased”. They also stated that “Human influence on the climate system is clear.” How did they reach those sobering conclusions?
Scientists from NASA and other research institutions around the world have been routinely collecting temperature data from a wide number of locations all over the planet. Their records of Earth’s average temperature go back to the 1880s, the earliest year for which reliable instrumental records were available worldwide. The National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), which is part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has maintained global average monthly and annual records of combined land and ocean surface temperatures for more than 130 years. These data show that temperatures have climbed to more than 1.8°F (1°C) above pre-industrial levels as of 2015, and the long-term global upward trend is clear and unambiguous (Figure 1)

The June 1989 Associated Press article “U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked” was authentic and accurately presented in a May 2019 Facebook post. But the implication that these prognostications about climate change had not come to pass was not accurate, as experts continued to identify events (such as extreme weather, wildfires, and coastal flooding) as previous predictions that had been validated in the thirty years since.

Wake up everyone: This has been going on since 1892.

Follow me
Youtube video is below

Record coral cover is being seen across much of the Great Barrier Reef as it recovers from past storms and mass-bleaching events. Subscribe: Read more here: But the new coral taking over is leaving the reef more vulnerable to future devastating impacts, according to the Australian Institute of Marine Science. The institute’s head, Dr Paul Hardisty speaks with ABC News about the report. ABC News provides around the clock coverage of news events as they break in Australia and abroad, including the latest coronavirus pandemic updates. It’s news when you want it, from Australia’s most trusted news organisation.

Of course Hardisty has to say the above, otherwise his funding would be cut. Don’t overlook this is propaganda, which means mix a bit of bullshit in with a bit of truth to push a narrative. The Great Barrier Reef is going to be fine.

Comment from David Ashton webmaster:
Video is below
video is below
YES! This lady Louise is an idiot and her parents probably can’t believe they spawned her. Enjoying the lifestyle using oil to get around then wanting it stopped is such an oxymoron. The next few Telegram Posts are all related. The Great Awakening is happening – you can’t trick us anymore and we spot bullshit a mile away.

Banks and Insurance Companies would surely give a zero valuation to new properties next to the ocean right?

This would prove beyond doubt that Climate Change / Climate Crisis / Climate Emergency was really happening. No so fast. Listen to the next two videos. Warning: Foul language used in the Dan Pena backs Trump video.

Electric Car Batteries – all batteries – are causing just as much if not more environmental damage as “Big Oil” and the Coal Industry.

Check out this video about what batteries are going to do to our oceans. Any wonder screwtube deleted it. You can’t be allowed to know this stuff, they are in charge remember? For heavens sake, there’s no way you can be an informed human being on this planet – so you stay in line say the Tyrants.

Ripping the Ocean to Shreds video retrieved from webarchive and saved to the right

Climate change is all about robbing the planet by transferring your tax dollars to kleptocrats abroad

Posted by Editor, cairnsnews

by Jim Rickards

Showing that the Green New Deal is actually the Green New Scam has always been easy.

All you have to do is refer to scientific facts rather than pseudo-science and phony models. Then you’re on the right track.

There are now so many polar bears some countries are considering hunting.

For example, did you know that polar bear populations have tripled in recent years and some countries are considering allowing a polar bear hunt?

That’s quite a contrast to the last lonely polar bear swimming for a melting piece of drift ice in Al Gore’s 2006 book and movie An Inconvenient Truth.

Did you know that the climate models used by the UN can’t even backtest correctly with actual data let alone forecast with speculative data?

Did you know that CO2 is not a pollutant? It’s actually plant food and we could use more of it if we really want a green planet.

Did you know that hurricanes, tornados and blizzards are neither more frequent nor more severe than in past decades?

Did you know that forest fires in California are caused by gross mismanagement of forests rather than climate?

This list goes on, but you get the point.

Most of the data thrown around by climate alarmists are either false or not nearly as troubling as it sounds when put in an empirical context.

To the extent the climate does change over time, it has nothing to do with CO2 and methane and much more to do with sunspots, ocean currents, volcanoes, the jet stream and other natural forces we cannot control.

That much is easy.

The difficult part in my mind has always been, why?

Why do so many elites and other supposedly smart people repeat scientific garbage ad nauseum to hypnotize large populations who lack the data or skills needed to tear the alarmist claims apart?

At the recent climate summit conference held in the luxury resort of Sharm El Sheikh in Egypt called COP27, the parties agreed to transfer over $230 billion to poorer countries as “climate reparations” for damage supposedly done by wealthy nations.

Never mind that the delegates mostly arrived by private jets that spew more CO2 in a few hours than an automobile does in years.

Never mind that the largest polluter in the world, China, will not be contributing to the fund.

Never mind that the entire basis for claims of damage from CO2 emissions is bogus.

None of this can be allowed to stand in the way of the agenda.

The entire green new scam is just a device to transfer wealth from rich western nations to poor nations all over the world.

It’s a financial hijacking conducted by people who hate America and love wealth transfers to socialist and corrupt nations around the world.

That’s the dirty little secret behind the climate alarmist agenda.

It’s not about saving the planet. It’s about robbing the planet by transferring your tax dollars to kleptocrats abroad.

Forget about global warming. Just get your checkbook out and hand over the money.

Thank you for being a member of our community and have a great weekend. All the best,

Rumble video added 26 June 2023

Follow me

Added 26 June 2023

Follow me at: