Stew Peters 
So there’s a new scientific paper available online. Don’t expect to hear anything about this from the press, even though it comes directly from the supposed expert class. It’s co authors include a professor at Oxford two Johns Hopkins professors and the director of Harvard Medical School’s center for global health delivery. The paper is titled:

COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults, a risk benefit assessment and five ethical arguments against mandates at universities.

It’s a pretty boring title, but here’s what the paper actually says. Quote,

we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm. For every COVID 19 hospitalization prevented, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including up to three booster associated myocarditis cases, and up to 3234 cases of grade three or more reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities

, unquote. Well, that might still be a little confusing for some of us. So we’ll just spell it out to you directly.

Harvard University is top guy for global health delivery. In other words, their top vaccine expert is telling people that forcing young people to take COVID jabs is up to 98% Worse than just letting them be exposed to the virus since the virus poses basically zero threat to them. The paper continues quote,

university booster mandates are unethical because one no formal risk benefit assessment exists for this age group. Two vaccine mandates may result in an expected harm to individual young people. Three mandates are not proportionate expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmissions and four US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare, serious vaccine related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes. Oh and five mandates create wider social harms.

So once again, they’re not spelling it out as clearly as they could. But in Reason number three, what they’re actually admitting is that basically the shots don’t work. They don’t keep people out of the hospital and they don’t even stop COVID from spreading, they do almost nothing other than poisoning. And reason number four, what they’re saying is vaccine mandates are unethical because we now know that tons of young people will suffer permanent injuries from these shots and they can’t even get compensation when that happens, because Congress deliberately gave Pfizer and Moderna total immunity from any lawsuits from their poisonous shots. Steve Kirsch is a tech entrepreneur has become one of the top trackers of the mass vaccination fraud, and he joins us now Steve, thanks so much for coming. What do you make of all of this?

Steve Kirsch
Well, it’s nice that these people are finally acknowledging what has been in plain sight for well over a year now. So I’m grateful for that because when you attach names from Johns Hopkins from Harvard, from UCSF, that then causes people to listen to what is being said. And so even though the data has been out there for a long time, since really the beginning of the vaccination program, it is not in been until these people who are highly respected, speak out and say, Whoa, these, vaccines are not as safe as people have been telling you.

When that happens, that’s when this mass psychosis starts to crumble because people don’t believe the data because they can’t interpret the data. They don’t have the skills to interpret the data don’t have the time to interpret the data. So they rely on experts. And all these experts have been hush hush about the vaccines until now. And now it’s like it’s so blatant. That they’ve decided that, hey, they’re better off being on the right side of history and acknowledging it now. Because it is so obvious. You can’t hide it anymore.

Look, they hid that autism was associated with vaccines. They’ve hidden the fact that all of these vaccines that they’ve given you, they don’t have any risk benefit studies showing that the vaccines, the other vaccines, all the other vaccines are basically beneficial to you. You know, they’ve kept that hidden and people aren’t acknowledging that. So it’s really nice that we have some scientists course are stepping over the line and are risking their future funding and career and so forth, to tell the truth about these vaccines. And it means that every single university and school should not be mandating these vaccines, or anyone.

Stew Peters
Anybody should be allowing them to be given to anyone. It’s too little too late for me on these Harvard elites because they were the ones of Johns Hopkins everybody coming out saying the safe and effective narrative. To me this looks like backpedaling because accountability could be coming.

Steve Kirsch
Yes. And so you’d rather be on the right side of history, rather than being on the wrong side. So I think these people you know are now seeing that you’re not gonna be able to hide this anymore. The Israeli data showed very clearly causality, severe harm, injuries that didn’t go away. There’s just lots of stuff that’s coming out now, that makes it you can’t find a rock that’s big enough to hide under. So it makes sense that they’re coming out now saying, Well, you know, it’s not good for the kids. Well, hey, it’s not good for anyone.

And hopefully, they’ll quickly you know, figure that one out. You know, Martin Kulldorff penned an article a few months ago, in July, early July, he penned an article on Brownstone Institute website. Nobody read it. Come on. Martin Kulldorff was on the FDA Committee. He was on the CDC committee, and he’s a tenured professor at the Harvard Medical School. And he’s a believer in the vaccine. But he said in his article that they have completely failed to show that this vaccine has more benefits than risks.

Stew Peters
It’s not a panacea. That’s why

Steve Kirsch
Yeah, well, you know, we don’t even have to go there. Stu. We, it’s like, there you cannot have a medical intervention that you are mandating.

Stew Peters
Well, I have to disagree with that

Steve Kirsch
with clear if there’s not a clear benefit. And here he says there’s no there’s nothing. Nobody should be getting this, no doctor should be recommending it for kids. Any doctor that does that is engaged in malpractice in my opinion. Because you don’t now the data is out now, they’ll use the excuse that you need a preprint. Right, that has not been peer reviewed. And it’s just in a preprint and we’ll wait until it passes peer review. You know, that’s crazy. Well, you know that the there’s a principle in medicine called The Precautionary Principle. And the precautionary principle says that if there’s something that’s out there that says might be harmful. It’s like, whoa, stop the presses. So at a minimum, people should be saying, hey, let’s put a pause on this mandate. Until this paper passes peer review or whatever, everybody should be hitting the pause button. And then when it passes peer review, they can say oh, now we got to nix it now.

Stew Peters
Do you think they that battling some of this though, means that language is you know, semantics is important. So like when you say we don’t even have to go there with whether you call it a vaccine or not? They’re not though. So we are participating in a fraud. If we’re calling them a vaccine, a vaccine provides immunity. This has negative efficacy, you’re more likely to get sick after these, the Israeli data that you brought here. It should have been the biggest story in the news. I think we’re the only platform that covered it other than Steve kirsch.substack.com. How about this because the press loves to quote experts from Johns Hopkins and Harvard will they ignore this?

Steve Kirsch
They have so far. Right? And that’s the stunning thing, but they can do that. You see Stu because the reason they can do that is they can say well, it’s not in a peer. It’s not in a peer reviewed journal yet. And when it is in the peer reviewed journal, then we’ll have our fact checkers take a look at it and and all that before we report it. And so they’re basically saying, let’s take the conservative approach,  we’re reporters we don’t want to mislead people. We don’t want to give them false information. It’s not yet peer reviewed. And so therefore, it’s not science. Well, it’s Come on.

Stew Peters
Let me let me translate that for all of our viewers. We’re receiving millions of dollars a quarter from Pfizer and Moderna to advertise their death serum. We’re not going to say anything to compromise that because Big Pharma makes up about 70% of our operating budget that about covered

Steve Kirsch
Well, you know that that’s one way but you know, look, they can they can legitimately say You know, you know, that cast aside which would be a little bit of conspiracy theory ism, one cannot

Stew Peters
They sponsor their shows, I mean that you can’t of course they do, but it’s montages that we play with all of the brought to you by Pfizer over at Fox News Channel, I mean, millions of dollars a year. So it’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s fact they, it’s it funnels millions of dollars to these networks.

Steve Kirsch
Yes, but in defense of the, you know, I’ll play devil’s advocate here, but in defense of the reporters, the reporters could very legitimately say, it’s not peer reviewed. I don’t want to speak about something that hasn’t been peer reviewed, because that might be misinformation.

Stew Peters
Well, safe and effective, is peer reviewed. How about that? Because they’ve been saying safe and effective is that peer reviewed, has any peer reviewed journal so that these shots are safe and effective? Because that’s the narrative that all of these reporters, all of these anchors, all of these shields for the shot have been pushing for over a year and a half now?

Steve Kirsch
Yes. Well, you know, they rely on expert opinion for that because there is no study that looks at these that the risk benefit on a totality basis. I mean, they did it they supposedly did in these clinical trials, but the clinical trials were gamed, they basically kicked out people who reacted to the first dose and just wiped them off the numbers of the trial, so that the trial would look like wow, you know, nobody reacted in the vaccine group. Nobody reacted in the placebo group, you’re, you know, it’s a very small number. It’s like, you know, some 1% And so therefore, they say, Hey, look, you know, this is no more dangerous than, than placebo.

Stew Peters
Okay? And but the co authors here include a professor at Oxford to Johns Hopkins professors, the director of Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health delivery. Isn’t that an expert opinion?

Steve Kirsch
Yes, but it’s not peer reviewed yet. And so the press could go and legitimately claim Hey, this is a preprint. It’s not peer reviewed. It’s from legitimate scientists. And at a minimum, if I were a member of the press, if I were a mainstream press, I would say hey, precautionary principle says that we let you know about this. This is serious. We you should know about this. It’s a preprint. But you should know about it. And that’s what they should be doing. They should be letting everybody know about it. And pointing out that these people that write it are people like Vinay Prasad and Vinay Prasad is very well known for picking apart all these studies. So if a Vinay Prasad has his name on a paper like this, and you know, this would be true for the other authors as well. They don’t put their name on junk science. And so, even though it’s a preprint, they did a preprint because they didn’t want to delay getting this information out to people. And it’s from very credible people using data from the manufacturers, as well as from the CDC from the from the vaers systems. So it’s a it’s an you can’t dispute the numbers I mean, this is something that I found over a year ago, can only that these guys are finally realizing that my analysis was correct,

Stew Peters
but like to the club,

Steve Kirsch
but now that it comes from them if they you know, the press can’t ignore it,

Stew Peters
but they’re going to and you’re a lot more forgiving than I am but let me just reiterate. Harvard’s top vaccine expert says that the COVID jab is up to 98 times worse than just letting people get exposed to the virus since the virus poses basically zero threat

Steve Kirsch
right

Stew Peters
so we will say, I’ve got about a minute left here. What’s your final words on this expert draft? will be responsible?

Steve Kirsch
No, you know, I, I emailed the the president of Stanford who I know hey, you’re gonna stop shots. No reply. I’ve been trying to bring this Israeli study that shows the definitive proof of causality and severe events and so forth. Nobody wants to see that data. The only guy who wanted to see the data is Martin Kulldorff used to be a full professor at Harvard. He still is. He’s on leave from Harvard. He’s on he or he used to be on the FDA and the CDC advisory committees. And so there’s, there’s very few people that are more qualified than Martin Kulldorff. And he’s the only guy because he cut his ties with Harvard, and he cut his ties with the FDA and the CDC. He’s the only guy who actually wants to see the Israeli safety data. That’s stunning. Nobody else wants to see the safety data. They go you know, this is like, you know, hear no evil, hear no evil, see no evil, and speak no evil. These guys. These scientists that are on the outside committees of the FDA and the CDC are personification of that you know, hear no evil See No Evil speak no evil and people within the CDC, I’ve emailed over 200 You know, close to 300 people at CDC involved in safety and of these COVID vaccines,

Stew Peters
crickets

Steve Kirsch
and I asked them, Hey, do you want to see the data? Not a single person responded.

Stew Peters
Nobody’s home.

Steve Kirsch
Nobody’s home. They don’t want to see any negative data has

Stew Peters
people at the CDC, those people at the FDA and a lot of other three letter agencies, but specifically speaking of the press, just like the other Four mentioned, the press gets no pass for me. No excuses, no pass. If you can find it, if I can find it. They know it’s there. And they are still perpetuating a safe and effective narrative, which is a complete lie and it’s leading to people dying. Period. Thank you, Steve. We appreciate you being here.

Steve Kirsch
Thanks Stew.